What is a Photograph?

I have a few questions:

1. when is a photograph really a photograph?
2. is it when it's a true/unaltered representation of what the imaging technology/device originally captured?...
3. ...or is it when it's a true representation of what the human eye agrees to be 'realistic'?
4. if question 2 above is true, will a crisp, colorful 21 megapixel raw file of a beautiful bride with great bokeh be any less of a photograph than a blurry, noisy black and white image gotten from an ancient pin-hole camera?
5. is blending 3 captures (with different points of focus) to simulate a large depth of field really less photography than closing up the aperture (in-camera) to get a larger depth of field? (or the converse...blurring parts of an image to simulate great bokeh as opposed to opening up the shutter)
6. if question 3 is true, shouldn't blending 3 bracketed captures with the aim of nearer approximating human-perceived dynamic range be the goal?
7. if the issue is whether or not the effect was achieved in-camera, what happens when cameras of the future have HDR as an in-buillt feature?
8. finally what happens when said future technology allows us to bypass the camera altogether?


Popular posts from this blog

"Adunni Dares to Dream" My Illustration Process

Quick One: On Typecasting

The Netflix Effect